February 2012
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
« Jan   Mar »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829  

Day February 16, 2012

Spontaneous Combustion Panel at CAA 2012

I’m speaking on the New Media Caucus-sponsored panel “Spontaneous Combustion!” organized by Preston Poe for the upcoming College Art Association conference next week in Los Angeles. The panel will take place on February 25th at 10am at The Velaslavay Theatre. Full details below:


Spontaneous Combustion!

“Control over change would seem to consist in moving not with it but ahead of it. Anticipation gives the power to deflect and control force.”
-Marshall McLuhan

This panel will explore the dynamics of social networking sites and open source software as it is being utilized in postmodern digital art practice. Currently, artists are collaborating, networking, performing and creating interventions in social, political and conceptual art utilizing frameworks created under a variety of contexts.

Preston Poe, Panel Chair

Preston Poe is an artist working with a wide range of media, often creating site-based performance and installation, as well as New Media Professor, and Director of The Electronic Gallery at Salisbury University.

He will share his experiences as artist, programmer, collaborator and facilitator in the context of the broad range of performance-based social sculpture and site-specific New Media.

Lee Montgomery, “My Greatest Successes: Improvisation, Documentation and Failure”

By presenting several examples of works from his own career, Lee will reveal the failures that most defined some of his more successful works, and how those failures were redeemed or diminished by subsequent documentation.

Lee Montgomery is the founder of Neighborhood Public Radio (an ongoing, eight year long, transmission based collaborative project with social practice overtones) and is Assistant Professor of Electronic Art in the Department of Art
and Art History at the University of New Mexico. Lee’s work with his collaborators in NPR has been presented at the Museum of Contemporary Art in Los Angeles, The Contemporary Museum in Baltimore, the Santa Barbara Contemporary Art Forum, The DeYoung Museum, and the 2008 Whitney Biennial.

Ceci Moss, “Internet Aware, Post Internet, Expanded Internet: Recent Developments in Internet-Based Art Practice”

Ceci Moss is a PhD candidate and an Adjunct Instructor in the Department of Comparative Literature at New York University. Her research addresses contemporary internet-based art practice, digital technology and perception, the materiality of media, postmodernism and digital art preservation.

Within the last 5 years or so, two terms have cropped up in discussion of contemporary internet-based art – “internet aware art” and “post internet art.” These works are not intended to be viewed and experienced exclusively online, but are seen as always having the potential to go offline, in many cases becoming physical objects. The dispersed nature of many of these works also allows multiple forms of engagement, across a number of different contexts. This paper will review these concepts of “post-internet” or “internet aware” art while also providing examples of recent internet-based art practice that seems
to pertain to these ideas by artists such as David Horvitz, Artie Vierkant, Kari Altmann, Travess Smalley, Mark Leckey, Seth Price, Samara Golden, Anne de Vries and others. Why, within the past 5 years, have internet artists been so attentive to the materiality of their projects, often working both on and offline? How does this relate to a digitally-informed experience of being in public? Is this a response to shifting conditions within the space of the internet itself, brought on by social media, expanded bandwidth (allowing the faster transmission of video, images, sound, animation, etc.), and a limitless landscape of data? Are we seeing the emergence of expanded internet-based art, perhaps akin to expanded cinema?

Joseph Delappe, HEAD SHOT! Performative Interventions in Online Gaming.

Joseph DeLappe is a Professor of the Department of Art at the University of Nevada where he directs the Digital Media program. Working with electronic and new media since 1983, his work in online gaming performance and electromechanical installation have been shown throughout the United States and abroad – including exhibitions and performances in Australia, the United Kingdom, China, Germany, Spain, Belgium, the Netherlands and Canada.

Delappe’s work as a performance artist operating in online gaming contexts is uniquely situated as an ontological explorer through the promulgation of political agency, critical mischief, and hacktivist positioning. He’ll direct his focus towards two of his most recent projects engaging in durational performative actions online. dead-in-iraq (2006 – 2011) was an in-game protest/memorial taking place in America’s Army, the popular Defense Department funded recruiting first person shooter, wherein the names of fallen United States military are typed by the author into the game’s text messaging system. He has also engaged in the creative reenactment of aspects from the life of Mahatma Gandhi in the online community. These include, The Salt Satyagraha Online: Gandhi’s March to Dandi in Second Life, (2008) involved the creative reenactment of Gandhi’s famous 240 mile, 1930 protest march in what was a mixed reality durational performance work involving a specially converted treadmill.

Robert Lawrence, “Performance, Space and Time: Site Specific Activities”

Robert Lawrence will share with the panel and attendees several open source tools and strategies developed for simultaneous web streaming of live video from international dispersed mobile devices. These will be presented in the context of their application in his own Tango Intervention series that has been produced in 33 international cities, most recently as part of Exchange Radical Moments, a live art festival in 11 cities in Europe on 11-11-11.

Interdisciplinary artist Robert Lawrence has engaged the unique conceptual opportunities of the Internet to examine issues of location, of ‘site’, of physical and cultural ‘position’. He approaches electronic art as social sculpture and
he is very interested in the ways that digital technologies are reformulating the formerly restrictive rolls of media producer and media consumer. All his work is developed in three complimentary – and often contradictory – streams: one in
the physical world, one in the virtual world, and one in the media world. Through this hybrid practice he directly engages the way contemporary life is lived, and identity is continually reconstructed, through our engagements with real, mediated and virtual influences.

Ei Jane Janet Lin, “Humanity at its Best”

Ei Jane Janet Lin is a Chicago-based performance/video artist with a fiber and material studies background from Taipei, Taiwan. She holds a MFA from The School of the Art Institute of Chicago and BFA from Maryland Institute College
of Art. Her work deals with the many complex, contentious and multi-layered relationships existing between the East and the West, reality and fantasy, and convention and transgression through performances of sexuality and power exchange in art and pornography.

In my collaborative performance video works with artist Miao Jiaxin, I document humanity through sharp juxtapositions between contrasting virtual and analog worlds. With my collaborator, I interacted online with the community of cam4 in
explicitly Performance Art oriented interventions. The website cam4 describes itself accurately as ‚”Free Live Sex Webcams – Free Live Cams Sex Chat‚”. My performances play with the expectations and limits of the cam4 community, flowing in and out of variously experimental erotic, comedic and theatrical moments.

Contemporary art does not account for that which is taking place | e-flux

So what is contemporary about contemporary art? Does art itself point to the term or vice versa? Whatʼs going on? Have people forgotten to ask artists if they are contemporary artists? One answer is that the term is a convenient generalization that does not lend itself to reflection and constant rethinking in the manner of established theoretical terms such as Postmodernism. It allows a separation from the act of making or doing art and the way it is then presented, explained and exchanged. Both artists and curators can find a space in the gap between these two moments where they are temporarily considering an exceptional case with every new development or addition to the contemporary inventory. Yet, an inventory of art spaces alone, for example, cannot help us find a categorization of participation within the realm of the contemporary. The question is how to categorize art today in a way that will exceed the contemporary. The inclusiveness of the contemporary is under attack, as this very inclusiveness has helped suppress a critique of what art is and more importantly what comes next. We know what comes next as things stand—more contemporary art.

The installation—and by association the exhibition itself—is the articulation of the contemporary. Even paintings cannot escape this “installed” quality, the considered and particular installation of things and images, even when approached in a haphazard or off-hand manner. We all have an idea of what contemporary art represents while only knowing the specifics of any particular instance. It is this knowing what it means via evoking a particular that pushes people towards an attempt to transcend this generality.

Rhizome | Artist Profile: Haroon Mirza

All your found sculptural assemblages are culled from your immediate local surroundings and re-appropriated into Rube Goldberg like contraptions with each object serving a very specified transmissive function. The sculptural forms then become crucial as they exist to explicate the sounds themselves. Can you expand on the intentionality of the material used, or lack thereof? How do you approach the documentation of these sculptures as images on the internet, without the accompanied support/context of audio? 

As images or objects devoid of their operational potential, the works are sculptures like any other static and quiet object of art.  I see their formal qualities as a thing in itself – the aesthetic result of a process of engineering music.  So the form follows function and therefore the composition or constellation of objects becomes somehow more gestural than designed.  Of course as images it is difficult to understand the work as a whole but I hope that the form opens up some ideas around traditional sculpture.